<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Natal be Microsoft&#8217;s 32x?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dragonchasers.com/2009/06/09/could-natal-be-microsofts-32x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dragonchasers.com/2009/06/09/could-natal-be-microsofts-32x/</link>
	<description>But what will you do when you catch one!?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 03:19:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://dragonchasers.com/2009/06/09/could-natal-be-microsofts-32x/#comment-123176</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dragonchasers.com/?p=2204#comment-123176</guid>
		<description>One preview I read said there would be a separate box housing the processor; looking for the link now. But even if the CPU is in the sensor it could still be used when idle, depending on what its capabilities are.

[UPDATE]
Actually Sage, I may have misread. Engadget says (http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/project-natal-video-hands-on-impressions-and-further-details/)  it consisted of a &#039;small black box&#039; about the size of a Roku player, and I read that as a separate box in addition to the sensor bar, but it seems that box *is* the sensor bar. 

So I stand corrected. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One preview I read said there would be a separate box housing the processor; looking for the link now. But even if the CPU is in the sensor it could still be used when idle, depending on what its capabilities are.</p>
<p>[UPDATE]<br />
Actually Sage, I may have misread. Engadget says (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/project-natal-video-hands-on-impressions-and-further-details/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/project-natal-video-hands-on-impressions-and-further-details/</a>)  it consisted of a &#8216;small black box&#8217; about the size of a Roku player, and I read that as a separate box in addition to the sensor bar, but it seems that box *is* the sensor bar. </p>
<p>So I stand corrected. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SAGExSDX</title>
		<link>http://dragonchasers.com/2009/06/09/could-natal-be-microsofts-32x/#comment-123175</link>
		<dc:creator>SAGExSDX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dragonchasers.com/?p=2204#comment-123175</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen articles talking about Natal having its own processor. And I guessed that it would have its own processor while they were showing it at E3. But I never read anywhere that there was a separate box/PC hidden away. I always assumed the processor was all in the camera device. Do you have a source?

That said, I definitely agree with Tipa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen articles talking about Natal having its own processor. And I guessed that it would have its own processor while they were showing it at E3. But I never read anywhere that there was a separate box/PC hidden away. I always assumed the processor was all in the camera device. Do you have a source?</p>
<p>That said, I definitely agree with Tipa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://dragonchasers.com/2009/06/09/could-natal-be-microsofts-32x/#comment-123174</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dragonchasers.com/?p=2204#comment-123174</guid>
		<description>Some elements of setting and gameplay don&#039;t have to be as responsive as others, so the delay might not be problematic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some elements of setting and gameplay don&#8217;t have to be as responsive as others, so the delay might not be problematic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irata</title>
		<link>http://dragonchasers.com/2009/06/09/could-natal-be-microsofts-32x/#comment-123173</link>
		<dc:creator>Irata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dragonchasers.com/?p=2204#comment-123173</guid>
		<description>Forgot the link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYuJivFFa-c</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYuJivFFa-c" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYuJivFFa-c</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irata</title>
		<link>http://dragonchasers.com/2009/06/09/could-natal-be-microsofts-32x/#comment-123172</link>
		<dc:creator>Irata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dragonchasers.com/?p=2204#comment-123172</guid>
		<description>Nah, all you need to see is uber-cute girl gamer Felicia Day playing around with Natal to ease all your doubts. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, all you need to see is uber-cute girl gamer Felicia Day playing around with Natal to ease all your doubts. <img src='http://dragonchasers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tipa</title>
		<link>http://dragonchasers.com/2009/06/09/could-natal-be-microsofts-32x/#comment-123171</link>
		<dc:creator>Tipa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dragonchasers.com/?p=2204#comment-123171</guid>
		<description>Unless Natal is hooked directly into the XBox bus in some way, I can&#039;t see transferring game state in and out of the XBox at even really fast serial speeds would pay for the time spent managing it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless Natal is hooked directly into the XBox bus in some way, I can&#8217;t see transferring game state in and out of the XBox at even really fast serial speeds would pay for the time spent managing it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Werit</title>
		<link>http://dragonchasers.com/2009/06/09/could-natal-be-microsofts-32x/#comment-123170</link>
		<dc:creator>Werit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dragonchasers.com/?p=2204#comment-123170</guid>
		<description>I had the 32x!  The Star Wars game and Doom were a lot of fun on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the 32x!  The Star Wars game and Doom were a lot of fun on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

